92% of people fail their goals.
82% of employees are at risk of burnout.
$322 billion lost annually to burnout-related productivity drops.
Maybe the problem isn't people. Maybe it's goals.
Neuroscientist Anne-Laure Le Cunff spent years at Google before getting her PhD at King's College London. Her research led to a radical conclusion:
Linear goals in a nonlinear world create suffering, not success.
Her book Tiny Experiments proposes an alternative:
Replace goals with experiments.
The difference?
When a goal fails, you failed. When an experiment doesn't work, you learned something. Same outcome. Completely different psychological impact.
Three lessons from the book that changed how I think about work:
- Procrastination is protection. Neuroscience shows we delay tasks to avoid negative emotions. Instead of fighting resistance, ask what it's telling you.
- Hustle culture makes you dumber. Research shows burned-out employees have 60% reduced focus and 32% lower productivity. Working more doesn't mean achieving more.
- Uncertainty is opportunity. When you stop treating life as a path to follow and start treating it as a laboratory to explore, fear becomes curiosity.
I've started applying this to my own work. Instead of quarterly goals, I run weekly experiments. The pressure is down. The learning is up.
What would change if you replaced your biggest goal with an experiment?

Top comments (0)