When I first started trading with high volumes, I quickly ran into a major problem: dozens of sub-accounts, huge orders, and the constant risk that a single mistake could erase BTC or ETH profits in seconds. Every move felt like a game of survival - one wrong click, and hours of work vanish in a flash.
To regain control, I started testing different market-making programs and tools for algorithmic traders. What I realized fast is that there's no one-size-fits-all platform; each has unique strengths, tools, and quirks
My Workflow
I run three parallel strategies:
- Spot trading: For steady liquidity profits, monitoring the order book via WebSocket and instant webhook alerts for any balance changes.
- Futures: Higher risk, higher reward trades, where API execution speed is critical.
- Arbitrage across pairs: Taking advantage of price gaps between exchanges to capture instant gains. What used to take hours of manual work is now automated: the API executes orders lightning-fast, WebSocket provides full transparency, and webhooks notify me immediately about any balance changes.
Platform Comparison
• Tiered Spot Market Maker levels (MM1–MM3) based on volume and liquidity contribution.
• Maker fee rebates up to -0.0075% depending on tier.
• Access to institutional loan services and dedicated account support.
• Suitable for both high-volume traders and those scaling up.
• Minimum requirements: 30-day trading volume > $25M (MM1) or ≥0.1% of total maker volume (MM2).
• Tailor-made for liquidity providers of any scale.
• Maker fee rebates and taker fees as low as 0.02%.
• Fast, stable API connections with increased rate limits (FIX, REST, WebSocket) and cloud co-location.
• Additional perks: capital efficiency program, personalized KPIs, 24/7 support, market insights.
• Minimum qualifying volume: 0.1% of total exchange volume.
• Lightning-fast API execution, real-time WebSocket monitoring, and webhook notifications.
• Market-maker fees - -0.012%, effectively adding profit to every trade.
• Support for sub-accounts to run multiple strategies simultaneously.
• Designed for high-frequency traders seeking to minimize manual work and mistakes.
Bottom line
Choosing the right platform depends on your strategy and scale. Some traders prioritize execution speed and low fees, others need institutional features and flexibility. Combining a solid workflow with the right platform can give you a real edge in today's high-frequency trading world.
Top comments (0)