Future

Cover image for ⚑️ Hyperliquid vs Binance: Transparency on Trial
Paul Bennett
Paul Bennett

Posted on

⚑️ Hyperliquid vs Binance: Transparency on Trial

πŸ’­ When the market crashed last week and HYPE plunged near $20, Hyperliquid claimed zero bad debt and full on-chain transparency β€” a flex few CEXs could match.

But founder Jeff Yan went further, calling out centralized exchanges for underreporting liquidations during high-volatility events.

πŸ“‰ The Liquidation Debate
🧩 Hyperliquid runs fully on-chain β€” every order, trade, and liquidation is verifiable in real time.
⚠️ Yan alleged that Binance and others report only a fraction of real liquidations β€” sometimes 1 out of 1,000 β€” masking the real market stress.
πŸ’¬ In response, CZ defended Binance, saying ecosystem players like Binance and Venus β€œtook hundreds of millions out of their own pockets to protect users.”

πŸ“Š The Bigger Picture
πŸ”» The clash followed a brutal market wipeout β€” $19B in leveraged positions were liquidated as BTC fell from $122K to $102K.
πŸ’¨ Amid chaos, Hyperliquid reportedly handled $50–70B in trading volume without downtime, while Binance briefly faced technical issues.
🀝 Notably, Jeff Yan once joined the Binance Labs Incubation Program back in 2018 β€” making this confrontation even more symbolic.

πŸ’¬ Expert Take
🧠 Hyperliquid is positioning itself as the β€œanti-CEX,” proving that transparency isn’t just a buzzword when every trade lives on-chain. Meanwhile, Binance remains the liquidity king β€” but at what cost to visibility?

Top comments (0)