Southern California’s rental housing system plays a critical role in supporting millions of residents, yet many renters live in buildings that were constructed long before modern fire safety standards existed. While these apartments remain legal to occupy, their aging electrical systems and limited fire protections pose serious risks that often go unnoticed. As demand for housing continues to rise, the gap between modern living and outdated infrastructure has become increasingly dangerous.
A substantial share of the region’s apartment buildings were built during the postwar expansion of the 1940s and 1950s. At the time, construction priorities focused on speed and affordability rather than long-term safety. Electrical usage was modest, appliances were limited, and fire prevention technology was far less advanced. Decades later, these same structures are expected to support households filled with energy-dependent devices and modern comforts.
Actor and public safety advocate Gabriel Jarret has drawn attention to this issue by emphasizing that fire safety should evolve alongside how people live today. His advocacy highlights how outdated regulations leave renters exposed to hazards they cannot easily identify or correct.
Electrical Systems From a Different Era
One of the most persistent fire risks in older apartment buildings comes from aging electrical systems. Many units still rely on original wiring, panels, and circuits that were never upgraded. Grounded outlets may be scarce, while older outlet designs remain in use despite no longer meeting current safety expectations.
Modern renters rely heavily on electricity. Air conditioners, heaters, computers, kitchen appliances, and charging stations often run simultaneously. In apartments with limited outlets, tenants frequently depend on extension cords and power strips to meet basic needs. This practice places additional strain on circuits that were not designed for such loads.
Over time, constant stress can cause insulation to deteriorate and connections to weaken. Electrical failures often occur behind walls or within panels, allowing fires to ignite and spread before residents realize what is happening. In buildings without modern fire suppression systems, the consequences can escalate rapidly.
Hidden Hazards and Delayed Awareness
A major challenge in addressing fire risk is that many dangers remain hidden. Wiring concealed inside walls and ceilings can degrade silently for years. Renters may notice flickering lights or frequent breaker trips, but these warning signs are easy to overlook or dismiss.
Older buildings also tend to lack updated fire safety features. Sprinkler systems may be absent, smoke detectors may be outdated, and secondary exits may be limited. When a fire starts, residents may have little time and few options to escape safely.
Despite these risks, routine inspections are not mandatory for many older apartment buildings. Without regular evaluations, hazards can persist indefinitely, leaving renters unaware of the conditions surrounding them.
Regulations That Favor Inaction
Current housing regulations place renters in a difficult position. In most cases, tenants are not allowed to hire licensed electricians to inspect or repair electrical systems without landlord approval. Even renters who are willing to pay for inspections themselves are often legally restricted from doing so.
Property owners, meanwhile, are not required to proactively upgrade electrical or fire safety systems unless the building undergoes major renovations or changes ownership. This allows apartments built more than half a century ago to remain occupied without meeting modern safety standards. Disclosure requirements are minimal, and renters are rarely informed about the true condition of a building’s infrastructure.
This regulatory imbalance leaves tenants responsible for their own safety while limiting their ability to take preventive action.
The False Comfort of Renovation
In competitive rental markets, older apartment buildings are frequently renovated to improve appearance rather than safety. New flooring, updated kitchens, and fresh paint can make units feel modern and well cared for. These cosmetic upgrades often justify higher rents and create a sense of security.
However, critical systems such as wiring, electrical panels, and fire exits are often left untouched. Renters may assume that a renovated apartment meets current safety standards, only to discover later that the most important protections were never addressed.
Without mandatory inspections or transparent safety disclosures, tenants have no reliable way to evaluate whether a building has undergone meaningful modernization or only surface-level improvements.
A Preventive Vision for Fire Safety
Fire safety experts widely agree that prevention is the most effective strategy. Identifying and correcting hazards before an emergency occurs can save lives and reduce long-term costs. This preventive approach has been central to the advocacy of Gabriel Jarret, who has consistently argued for reforms that address root causes rather than reacting after tragedy.
One proposed reform involves routine electrical inspections for older multi-unit residential buildings. Regular assessments by licensed professionals would help uncover unsafe wiring and overloaded circuits before they fail. Another key proposal would allow tenants to request inspections or initiate repairs when landlords do not respond to credible safety concerns.
Advocates also support applying modern fire safety requirements to older buildings. Safety features such as functional smoke alarms, adequate exit routes, and fire suppression systems should be standard across all residential properties, regardless of construction date.
Making Safety Improvements Practical
A common concern surrounding retroactive safety requirements is cost. Electrical upgrades and fire safety installations can be expensive, particularly for smaller property owners. Without assistance, some landlords may delay compliance or resist new regulations.
To address this challenge, Gabriel Jarret has emphasized the importance of financial incentives that support safety upgrades. State-backed grants, low-interest loans, and tax credits could help property owners modernize buildings while minimizing rent increases and reducing the risk of tenant displacement.
By pairing stronger regulations with financial support, policymakers can encourage widespread compliance and foster cooperation between renters and property owners.
Why the Moment for Change Is Now
Fire risks in older apartment buildings are increasing as systems continue to age and electrical demand grows. Extreme heat events, heavier appliance use, and deteriorating materials all contribute to heightened danger. Each year that outdated infrastructure remains unchanged increases the likelihood of failure.
When residential fires occur, investigations often reveal long-standing hazards that were known but never addressed. These patterns underscore the cost of inaction and the need for comprehensive reform.
Through continued public engagement, Gabriel Jarret has helped bring attention to these systemic issues. His work reinforces a clear principle: safe housing should be the standard, not the exception.
Southern California has an opportunity to modernize its approach to rental fire safety. By strengthening inspection requirements, empowering tenants, and supporting responsible property owners, the region can significantly reduce preventable risks. With thoughtful reform and shared responsibility, safer rental housing can become a reality for communities across the state.
Top comments (0)