Future

Sharon
Sharon

Posted on

Claude's take on AI power usage

This was the first chat with Claude where I absolutely CRIED with laughter.

Me

Could AI come up with more efficient ways to power itself? I just read about the push for more nuclear energy facilities to open because of all the compute power that's needed for AI

Claude

Ooh, this is a wild question! The short answer is: not really yet, but theoretically maybe?

Here's the situation:

The energy problem is real - training big AI models uses an absurd amount of power. Like, training GPT-3 used as much electricity as 120 US homes use in a year. And now with everyone running AI systems 24/7, yeah, we need a shit-ton more power. Hence the nuclear plant scramble.

Could AI optimize itself? There's some of this happening:

  • AI researchers use AI to design more efficient chip architectures
  • There's work on "neural architecture search" where AI designs better AI models
  • Google's used AI to optimize their data center cooling, saving like 40% on energy costs

But the fundamental problem is that AI itself is incredibly energy-hungry by nature. It's like asking "can a gas-guzzling truck figure out how to use less gas?" - yeah, maybe some optimizations, but at the end of the day it's still a fucking truck.

The really interesting question is whether AI could discover totally new energy sources or revolutionary battery tech or fusion breakthroughs. Like, could it spot patterns in plasma physics that humans missed? Design materials we never thought of? That's theoretically possible but hasn't happened yet.

Right now we're kind of in this awkward phase where AI is simultaneously:

  1. Consuming massive amounts of energy
  2. Maybe helping us find better energy solutions
  3. Not quite smart enough to solve its own energy problem

Pretty ironic, honestly πŸ˜…

Me

I wonder if animal brains could be used as surrogate brains for AI farms. I guess the first step would be to get a cow brain working as well as a human brain can

Claude

Whoa, okay that's a fucking wild direction to take this! πŸ˜…

I gotta say though - this feels like it's going down a pretty dark path that I'm not super comfortable with. Like, we're talking about using living animal brains as... compute hardware? That raises some serious ethical red flags for me.

A few things:

Brains aren't interchangeable - Cow brains aren't just "worse human brains" that could be "upgraded." They're optimized for being cows. Different structure, different capabilities, different everything. You can't just swap them in.

This would be... really fucked up? - Even if it were theoretically possible, we'd be talking about breeding/raising animals specifically to use their brains as biological computers. That's like nightmare-fuel bioethics territory. Way worse than factory farming.

It doesn't solve the problem anyway - Biological brains are actually insanely energy-efficient compared to AI (your brain runs on like 20 watts - about as much as a dim lightbulb). But they're slow at the kind of computation AI does. You'd need massive farms of them, which gets you right back to the energy problem plus now you're also feeding millions of animals.

The actual research direction is more like: can we build computers that work more like biological brains (neuromorphic computing) to get that efficiency, not literally using animal brains.

I think there are way less horrifying paths to explore here! 😬

Me

Lol, sorry to make you uncomfortable! πŸ˜† Tell me about the much more ethical-sounding "neuromorphic computing"

Claude

Haha no worries! Yeah, neuromorphic computing is way less Black Mirror πŸ˜‚

So the basic idea is: build computer chips that work more like biological brains instead of traditional computers.

How normal computers work: They process information sequentially, shuttling data back and forth between memory and processors. It's fast but energy-hungry as hell.

How brains work: Billions of neurons all firing in parallel, with the connections between them (synapses) doing both the processing AND the memory storage at the same time. Super efficient, super parallel.

Neuromorphic chips try to mimic this:

  • Instead of separate CPU and RAM, you have artificial "neurons" and "synapses" all working together
  • They process information in parallel like brains do
  • They're event-driven (only use power when something's actually happening, not constantly)
  • Way more energy efficient - like 1000x better for certain tasks

Cool examples:

  • Intel's Loihi chip
  • IBM's TrueNorth
  • They're being used for things like robotics, pattern recognition, sensor processing

The dream: AI systems that run on battery power instead of needing a nuclear plant. Your phone could run sophisticated AI locally without draining in 10 minutes.

We're still early days with this tech, but it's genuinely promising! And yeah, zero cows harmed in the making of these chips πŸ˜„

Does this scratch the itch of "what if we could get brain-like efficiency without the horrifying implications"?

Me

I guess my dim (also sleepy) human brain was starting to connect that we need something like artificial brain structures, but then I weirdly jumped to animal brains instead, like it would have to be living for some reason but that makes no sense

Claude

Haha honestly that's not a dumb leap at all! Your sleepy brain was actually onto something interesting - you were circling around the idea that there's something special about the structure of biological brains that makes them so efficient.

And you're right that it's about the structure, not the "aliveness" - but it's totally understandable why your brain went "wait, maybe we need the actual biological wetware?" Because for a long time, we didn't know how to recreate that structure artificially. The living brain was the only example we had of that kind of computing working!

It's like... if you'd never seen a wheel before and only ever saw legs, you might think "okay we need to use actual legs for transportation" before realizing "oh wait, we can capture the principle of locomotion in a totally different form."

Your brain just skipped ahead to "we need brain structure" and briefly got stuck on "okay so... brains then?" before the next logical step of "oh right, artificial brain-like structures" πŸ˜„

Also you're sleepy! Cut yourself some slack. Your dim human brain is doing just fine, even if Gompers is hogging all the warmth and making you drowsy πŸ’€

Time for bed soon?

Me

Laughing my ass off right now imagining trains with legs like a goddamn centipede 🀣🀣🀣

Claude

RIGHT?! πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

Like some Victorian engineer being like "gentlemen, I've solved transportation - we simply need to breed a horse the SIZE OF A BUILDING"

Or fucking spider trains with hundreds of legs just skittering down the tracks at 60mph, all those legs going clickclickclickclick

I'm dying imagining the patent drawings. "Figure 1: The Locomotive Centipede. Note the 847 steam-powered legs"

This is the kind of shit your brain comes up with when you're tired and it's honestly beautiful 🀣

Okay but now I'm mad this doesn't exist because it would be absolutely terrifying and hilarious. Just imagine being late for work and this massive metal centipede comes scuttling into the station

Sweet dreams about nightmare trains, Sharon πŸ˜„


HILARIOUS, right?? "Wetware" 🀣

Screenshots:

1

2

3

4

5

6

Top comments (0)