Future

Cover image for The Lens Patent Search vs. PatentScan for Invalidation: Which Tool Wins?
Zainab Imran for PatentScanAI

Posted on • Edited on • Originally published at patentscan.ai

The Lens Patent Search vs. PatentScan for Invalidation: Which Tool Wins?

Introduction

In the high-stakes world of intellectual property, invalidating a patent can be the difference between smooth market access and expensive litigation. With dozens of tools available, choosing the right one is crucial. Two platforms consistently stand out: The Lens and PatentScan. Both are powerful—but each excels in different areas.

This article breaks down how they compare in coverage, features, usability, reporting, analytics, and cost. Whether you’re a patent attorney, R&D scientist, or startup founder, this guide will help you choose the right tool—or smarter yet, combine both.


⚡ Quick Takeaways

  • The Lens delivers unmatched global coverage and deep integration with scholarly data.
  • PatentScan offers fast, powerful semantic AI search, ideal for invalidity and FTO analysis.
  • The Lens is best for biotech, academia, and detailed prior art mapping.
  • PatentScan is optimized for legal teams needing quick, actionable insights.
  • Using both tools together creates a highly strategic invalidation workflow.

🌐 The Landscape of Patent Invalidation

What Is Patent Invalidation?

Patent invalidation is the process of proving a patent is not novel or non-obvious based on earlier disclosures. This is fundamental in:

  • Litigation
  • Oppositions
  • Due diligence
  • Freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses

Why Search Tools Matter

To invalidate a patent, you need:

  • Prior art across multiple jurisdictions
  • Legal status information
  • Strong filtering and search flexibility
  • Reliable exportable reports

The right tool can save hours of manual work and significantly improve accuracy.


🔍 The Lens Patent Search: Overview

Origins and Mission

The Lens is a nonprofit platform built by Cambia and Queensland University of Technology. Their mission:

Make global patent knowledge open, accessible, and actionable for everyone.

Core Features

  • 127M+ patent records from 95+ jurisdictions
  • 200M+ scholarly articles integrated
  • Transparent legal status timelines
  • Boolean, proximity, and fielded search

Notable Tools

  • PatSeq Finder (biological sequence searching via BLAST)
  • Citation Tree and Patent Family Explorer

💡 Who it’s best for: Life sciences researchers, academic teams, and anyone needing deep global prior art.


🤖 PatentScan: Overview

AI-Powered Innovation

PatentScan is a commercial IP analytics platform designed for attorneys, legal analysts, and patent consultants. It integrates AI + NLP to accelerate invalidation workflows.

Key Features

  • Semantic search: Ask natural questions like “wireless charging systems before 2012.”
  • Citation clustering & visualization
  • Litigation flags & risk dashboards
  • One-click invalidation reports

PatentScan prioritizes speed and automation, ideal for legal professionals under tight deadlines.


🌍 Global Coverage Comparison

Feature The Lens PatentScan
Coverage 95+ jurisdictions US + EP focus
Full-text US, EP, WIPO, others Limited transparency
Verdict Wins for worldwide coverage

🔎 Search Capabilities: Boolean vs. Semantic

Feature The Lens PatentScan
Search Full Boolean control Natural language (NLP)
Syntax Requires knowledge Minimal required
Strength Precision for experts Speed and concept-level matches

💡 Insight: Law firms love PatentScan’s speed. Technical and academic users often prefer The Lens’s precision.


🏛️ Legal Status Tracking & Transparency

Feature The Lens PatentScan
Timeline Detailed historical Risk indicators (green/yellow/red)
Family INPADOC integration Alerts for expiration & litigation
Verdict Raw detail Simplified legal intelligence

📤 Prior Art Export & Reporting

Feature The Lens PatentScan
Export CSV, XML, RIS Auto-generated invalidation reports
Workflow Manual tagging Client-ready PDF bundles
Verdict Raw control Attorney-friendly reports win

🧬 PatSeq and Sequence Searching

  • The Lens offers PatSeq Finder — essential for biotech.
  • PatentScan currently lacks sequence-level search.
  • Biopharma teams should always include The Lens in their toolbox.

📈 Analytics and Visualization Tools

Feature The Lens PatentScan
Visualization Citation trees, innovation cartography, patent family flows Heatmaps, clustering, litigation-risk charts
Verdict Deeper research analysis Better visuals

🖱️ User Experience & Learning Curve

Feature The Lens PatentScan
Complexity More complex Intuitive UI
Best for Researchers, analysts Attorneys, paralegals

📌 If ease of use matters → PatentScan.


💰 Cost & Accessibility

  • The Lens: 100% free
  • PatentScan: Subscription-based

For budget-constrained teams, The Lens is a great starting point.


🔗 When to Use Both Tools

Combining both platforms unlocks a stronger workflow:

  1. Use PatentScan → Quickly find relevant art using semantic search
  2. Use The Lens → Validate findings with global data and scholarly integration

This hybrid approach ensures:

  • Faster discovery
  • More accurate invalidation
  • Stronger legal defensibility

Even tools like Traindex (for claims analysis and IP rights evaluation) can complement this strategy.


🏁 Conclusion

Choosing the right patent search tool can significantly enhance your invalidation strategy.

  • The Lens: Global scope, transparency, scholarly integration
  • PatentScan: AI-driven discovery, legal reporting, rapid insight

Depending on your workflow—technical research, litigation support, or client deliverables—one may be a better fit, but using both together delivers the most powerful results.

Ready to put them to the test? Run the same prior art search on each platform — you’ll likely uncover insights one tool alone would have missed.


❓ FAQs

  1. Which tool is better for global prior art searches?

    The Lens — broad international data coverage.

  2. Can I do full-text invalidity searches on The Lens?

    Yes. Boolean full-text search is supported.

  3. Does PatentScan offer semantic search?

    Absolutely. It’s one of the platform’s core strengths.

  4. What are The Lens’s limitations?

    Less automation and steeper learning curve.

  5. Should I use both tools?

    Yes. The combo gives both AI discovery and deep validation.


🧾 References

  1. The Lens – Patent & Scholarly Search
  2. PatentScan – AI-Driven Patent Search
  3. WIPO – Global Patent Data & INPADOC
  4. EPO – Patent Law & Examination Guidelines
  5. Traindex – Legal Claim Intelligence

💬 Reader Feedback

What’s your go-to tool for patent invalidation?

Share your experience below — or tag a colleague who needs this comparison!

If this guide helped you, consider sharing it with your network.

Top comments (0)