I've watched marketers spend $20 on ChatGPT Plus, type "write me a blog post about SEO," get 500 words of generic fluff, then declare AI "doesn't work for content."
The problem isn't the AI. It's the prompt.
After a year of testing every major AI platform for content creation, here's what I've learned: the difference between garbage output and genuinely useful content briefs comes down to how you talk to these systems. And most marketers are doing it wrong.
Why Your Current Prompts Are Failing
Let's start with what doesn't work. I see these patterns everywhere:
The Vague Ask: "Write content about digital marketing trends."
The Kitchen Sink: "Write a blog post about SEO that's engaging, informative, optimized, shareable, and converts readers into customers."
The Copy-Paste Special: Using the same prompt template for every piece of content.
Here's the thing about AI models like GPT-4 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet—they're prediction engines trained on the entire internet. When you give them a generic prompt, they give you the most statistically average response possible. Which is exactly what you don't want.
You want specific. You want distinctive. You want something that sounds like your brand, not like every other marketing blog that exists.
The Anatomy of Prompts That Actually Work
Good prompts have four components:
Context: Who you are, what you're creating, and why
Constraints: Specific limitations that force creativity
Examples: Show don't tell what you want
Output Structure: Exactly how you want the response formatted
Let me show you the difference.
Bad prompt:
"Write a content brief for a blog post about email marketing."
Good prompt:
"I'm a content manager at a B2B SaaS company (project management software) writing for marketing directors at 50-500 person companies. Create a content brief for a 1,500-word blog post about email marketing automation that addresses the specific pain point of managing lead nurture sequences when you have limited time and budget. The brief should include: headline options, key sections with specific angles, 3 real company examples to research, and 5 semantic SEO keywords beyond 'email marketing automation.' Tone should be practical and slightly skeptical of overhyped tactics."
See the difference? The second prompt gives the AI enough constraints to avoid generic responses.
Platform-Specific Techniques: ChatGPT vs Claude
I've run the same prompts through both platforms extensively. They have different strengths.
ChatGPT (GPT-4) excels at:
- Structured outputs with specific formatting
- Following complex multi-step instructions
- Generating variations and iterations quickly
- Understanding marketing frameworks and terminology
Claude 3.5 Sonnet excels at:
- Nuanced tone and voice matching
- Longer, more coherent content briefs
- Better at avoiding marketing jargon when you ask for it
- More conservative with claims (won't promise "10x growth" nonsense)
For content briefs specifically, I prefer Claude for initial creation and ChatGPT for refinement and variations.
The Content Brief Framework That Works
Here's the prompt structure I use for content briefs. It's worked across dozens of clients and content types:
Role: [Your specific role and company context]
Audience: [Specific persona with pain points]
Content Goal: [One primary objective]
Content Type: [Format, length, platform]
Constraints: [What to avoid, limitations, requirements]
Tone: [2-3 specific descriptors with examples]
Output: [Exact structure you want]
Examples: [1-2 similar pieces that worked]
Let me walk through a real example I used last month:
Role: Content strategist at a marketing agency serving e-commerce brands doing $1M-10M annually
Audience: E-commerce marketing managers who are overwhelmed by the number of available marketing channels and struggling to prioritize where to spend limited budgets
Content Goal: Help readers create a simple framework for channel prioritization that they can implement this quarter
Content Type: 2,000-word guide with actionable framework
Constraints: No generic advice ("test everything"), no tactics requiring enterprise-level budgets, must include specific tools under $200/month
Tone: Practical and direct, like a senior marketer mentoring a junior colleague. Acknowledge the complexity without being overwhelming.
Output: Content brief with headline options, 6-8 main sections, 3 case study suggestions, keyword list, and internal linking opportunities
Examples: [Links to two similar pieces that performed well]
The result? A 400-word content brief that my writer used to create one of our best-performing pieces of Q3.
Advanced Prompt Engineering Tricks
Use Negative Prompting
Tell the AI what NOT to include. "Don't use generic phrases like 'game-changer' or 'revolutionary.' Don't promise unrealistic results. Don't include tactics that require a $50K+ budget."
Chain Your Prompts
Don't try to get everything in one response. Start with a basic brief, then refine: "Now add 3 specific data points I should research to support each main section."
Give It Constraints That Force Creativity
"Write this brief as if the reader has exactly 30 minutes to implement the main tactic" or "Assume the reader has tried and failed at this before."
Use the 'Perspective Shift' Technique
"Write this brief from the perspective of a marketing director who's skeptical of new tactics" or "Approach this as if you're explaining to someone who's been burned by bad advice before."
Common Mistakes That Kill Your Results
Even with good prompt structure, I see marketers sabotage themselves:
Mistake 1: Not Iterating
Your first prompt won't be perfect. Good content briefs come from 2-3 rounds of refinement.
Mistake 2: Forgetting Context
AI doesn't remember what you told it yesterday. Include relevant context in every prompt.
Mistake 3: Asking for Everything at Once
Better to get a solid brief first, then ask for headline variations, then keyword suggestions. Break it down.
Mistake 4: Not Testing Different Approaches
The same prompt can yield different results depending on how you frame it. Try multiple angles.
Making AI Content Briefs Actually Useful
Here's what separates content briefs that sit in Google Docs forever from ones that become great content:
Specificity Over Comprehensiveness
Better to have 3 specific, actionable sections than 8 generic ones.
Research Hooks
Good briefs don't just outline content—they tell you exactly what to research. "Interview 2-3 customers who've struggled with this" is more valuable than "include customer examples."
Built-in Differentiation
Every brief should answer: "How is this different from the 47 other articles on this topic?" If your AI can't answer that, refine your prompt.
The Reality Check
Look, AI won't replace good marketing judgment. It won't magically know your brand voice without examples. And it definitely won't turn bad strategy into good content.
But when used correctly, it can turn a 2-hour brief-writing process into a 20-minute one. And the quality? Often better than what most of us were creating manually.
The key is treating AI like a very smart intern who needs clear direction, not like a magic content machine.
What's Next
Start with one piece of content. Use the framework above. Iterate until you get something you'd actually want to write from.
Then do it again. The prompts that work for your brand and audience are different from mine. But the structure—context, constraints, examples, output format—that's universal.
And remember: the goal isn't to eliminate human creativity. It's to spend less time on the scaffolding and more time on the insights that matter.
Because at the end of the day, even the best AI prompt can't replace knowing your audience well enough to solve their actual problems.
Top comments (0)