Future

Cover image for Kim Kardashian calls ChatGPT her frenemy after failing legal exams due to AIadvice
Saiki Sarkar
Saiki Sarkar

Posted on • Originally published at ytosko.dev

Kim Kardashian calls ChatGPT her frenemy after failing legal exams due to AIadvice

Kim Kardashian's AI Legal Mishap: A \"Frenemy\" Forewarning\n\nIn a candid revelation that has sparked conversations across the tech and legal worlds, reality TV star and aspiring lawyer Kim Kardashian recently opened up about her relationship with generative AI, specifically ChatGPT. Her verdict? It's a \"frenemy,\" a label she assigned after the AI's advice reportedly contributed to her failing legal exams. This surprising admission from a high-profile individual highlights a critical, emerging challenge in our increasing reliance on artificial intelligence for serious tasks.\n\nKardashian, known for her dedication to her legal studies, utilized ChatGPT as a study aid, seeking guidance and information. While AI can be an invaluable tool for information retrieval and summarization, its capacity for generating factually incorrect or misleading information remains a significant hurdle, particularly in nuanced fields like law where precision and accuracy are paramount. Her experience underscores a vital distinction: AI can assist, but it cannot yet replace the rigorous, verified information and critical thinking required for professional qualifications. The AI's responses, while perhaps confidently presented, lacked the verified accuracy and deep contextual understanding necessary for passing a bar exam.\n\nThis \"frenemy\" anecdote from Kim K serves as a potent reminder of the current limitations and the need for human oversight in AI-driven processes. As AI tools become more sophisticated and ubiquitous, users, especially those in high-stakes professions, must exercise extreme caution and independent verification. It's a call to action for developers to enhance AI's accuracy and for users to cultivate critical discernment, recognizing that while AI can be a powerful assistant, it is not an infallible oracle. The journey to truly reliable AI continues, and until then, human intelligence and judgment remain indispensable, especially when a legal career is on the line.

Top comments (0)