This is Day 4 of my 60‑day “learning Web3 in public” series as a non‑developer with a technical writing and community background.
Day 1 was about why I’m learning Web3 and aiming for DevRel/community roles.
Day 2 explained blockchain in plain English.
Day 3 went into Bitcoin: what it is, why it exists, and how mining and transactions work at a high level.
Today’s question is simpler but important: how is Bitcoin actually different from the “normal” money in my bank account? A helpful overview that nudged me to think clearly about this was “Cryptocurrency vs. Traditional Currency: Key Differences” – https://www.currencytransfer.com/blog/expert-analysis/cryptocurrency-vs-traditional-currency.
What is “traditional” money?
Traditional money (fiat currency) is the stuff most of us use every day: INR, USD, EUR, etc.
It’s issued by governments and managed by central banks.
Laws make it “legal tender” in a country, so it must be accepted for payments.
It exists as:
Physical cash and coins.
Digital balances in bank accounts, cards, UPI, online transfers.
Even when you pay online, you’re still using bank‑controlled, institution‑managed money sitting inside private databases.
Quick recap: what is Bitcoin?
Bitcoin is internet‑native money that runs on a public blockchain instead of a bank’s private system.
No central bank issues it; new coins follow a fixed schedule until 21 million exist.
The network, not a single institution, verifies and records transactions.
People can send value directly to each other over the internet if they follow the protocol’s rules.
If you want a structured breakdown of how Bitcoin and traditional money differ, “Bitcoin vs. Traditional Money: What’s the Difference?” is a good, beginner‑friendly read – https://crypto.101blockchains.com/bitcoin-vs-traditional-money/.
So both traditional money and Bitcoin are “money,” but they live in completely different systems.
Who controls it?
Control is one of the biggest differences.
Traditional money:
Issued and managed by central banks and governments.
Policy decisions can change interest rates and money supply.
Banks and payment processors can freeze, delay, or reverse some transactions.
Bitcoin:
Issuance follows code: block rewards on a fixed schedule, with halvings over time.
No single party can unilaterally change the rules; changes need broad network agreement.
Once a transaction has enough confirmations, reversing it is extremely hard in practice.
A simple way to say it:
Traditional money: trust institutions.
Bitcoin: trust code and network consensus.
Supply: flexible vs fixed
Traditional money:
Money supply is flexible; central banks can “print” more or pull money back from the system.
This can help in crises but can also lead to inflation over time.
Bitcoin:
Fixed maximum supply of 21 million coins baked into the protocol.
New coins enter via mining rewards that halve roughly every four years.
Nobody can suddenly decide to double the supply by decree.
If you want to go deeper into the 21 million number, “Understanding Bitcoin’s 21 Million Cap” is a good explainer – https://www.kellypartners.com.au/blog/understanding-bitcoins-21-million-cap.
This predictable scarcity is why people often call Bitcoin “digital gold.”
How transactions actually move
Traditional money:
Payments usually move through a chain of intermediaries:
You → your bank or app → card network/payment processor → recipient’s bank → recipient.
Each party updates its own database and can approve, reject, or reverse transfers.
Bitcoin:
Transactions are peer‑to‑peer on a public network:
Your wallet creates and signs a transaction → broadcasts it → miners include it in a block → nodes update the blockchain.
There is no central “approve” button as long as your transaction is valid and the fee is reasonable.
Tradeoff:
Traditional payments give customer support and chargebacks, but rely on intermediaries.
Bitcoin gives more direct control and fewer intermediaries, but also fewer safety nets.
Where it “lives”: bank account vs wallet
Traditional money:
Lives in bank accounts and payment apps.
On paper it’s “yours,” but operationally you rely on those institutions to hold and move it.
Accounts can be frozen or limited in some situations (fraud checks, regulations, etc.).
Bitcoin:
Lives in wallets controlled by private keys.
“Not your keys, not your coins” — if someone else holds the keys (like a custodial exchange), you’re trusting them.
If you hold your own keys, you control when and where funds move, as long as the network is running.
So traditional money gives less operational responsibility but less direct control. Bitcoin gives more control but more responsibility to keep things secure.
Stability vs volatility
Traditional money:
Usually relatively stable inside its home country day‑to‑day, outside extreme inflation cases.
Prices are set in fiat, and people are used to thinking in it.
Bitcoin:
Highly volatile when priced in fiat.
The value of 1 BTC in INR or USD can move a lot in short periods.
That makes it tough as a short‑term “unit of account,” even if people use it as a long‑term store of value.
For now, most people still do daily budgeting in fiat and treat Bitcoin more like an investment or alternative asset.
Borderless payments and access
Traditional money:
Cross‑border transfers often involve multiple banks and intermediaries.
They can be slow, expensive, and heavily gatekept by paperwork and limits.
Bitcoin:
Works the same whether you’re sending value across the street or across continents.
As long as both sides have internet and a wallet, you can move funds directly.
This is why Bitcoin often appears in discussions about remittances, financial inclusion, and cross‑border transfers.
So which is “better”?
It’s more honest to talk about tradeoffs than winners.
Traditional money tends to be better at:
Everyday stability in most countries.
Legal protections and consumer safeguards.
Frictionless local acceptance and pricing.
Bitcoin tends to be better at:
Scarcity and predictable issuance.
Borderless, censorship‑resistant transfers.
Giving individuals more direct control over their funds.
Bitcoin also has downsides:
- Volatility, learning curve, UX issues, risk of self‑custody mistakes.
And traditional money has downsides:
Exposure to inflation and policy changes.
Centralized control and potential account restrictions.
For DevRel and Web3 content, the goal isn’t to pick a side, but to explain these tradeoffs clearly so people can decide what makes sense for them.
Why this matters for non-technical people
If you want to work in Web3 content or DevRel, you’ll talk to:
People who think Bitcoin is the future of money.
People who think Bitcoin is nonsense.
People who are curious but overwhelmed.
Being able to calmly explain:
How Bitcoin is similar to and different from the money people already use.
Where each makes sense and what the tradeoffs are.
…is a key skill. For Day 4 in this series, the aim isn’t to crown a winner, just to see the landscape clearly enough that future topics like Ethereum, wallets, and DeFi have a solid foundation underneath them.
Top comments (0)