Ribhav

Posted on Dec 28

Layer 0 & Layer 3 — How Blockchains Become an Internet, Not Islands

#crypto #blockchain #beginners #web3community

Come hang out in Web3ForHumans on Telegram.
Follow me on Medium | Twitter | Future

Every few weeks, crypto Twitter discovers a new “layer”: first Layer 1 vs Layer 2, now people are talking about Layer 0 and Layer 3 like we skipped levels in a video game.

If Ethereum is already a “world computer”, why do we need even more layers on top and underneath it?

Today’s piece (Day 22) is about zooming out: instead of looking at one chain, think about an internet of blockchains and how different layers help them talk to each other and specialize for different apps.

Quick recap: L1 and L2 (so we don’t get lost)

Before going into new buzzwords, anchor the basics.

Layer 1 (L1): Base blockchains like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana.
- They handle consensus, security, and transaction ordering.
- You deploy smart contracts directly on them (Uniswap on Ethereum, Solend on Solana).
Layer 2 (L2): Scaling layers built on top of L1.
- Rollups and similar tech that process transactions off‑chain and then settle back to L1.
- Examples: Arbitrum, Optimism, zkSync, Base on Ethereum.

If L1 is a city’s road network, L2s are elevated expressways that reduce traffic without rebuilding the city from scratch.

Layer 0 and Layer 3 show up when you ask two bigger questions:

How do multiple “cities” (blockchains) connect?
How do we create app‑specific environments when even L2s start feeling too crowded?

What is Layer 0? The “railway network” between cities

Intuition first

Layer 0 is the infrastructure layer that connects multiple blockchains and helps you launch new ones.

Instead of having many isolated L1s that don’t talk to each other, Layer 0 gives them shared rails, security, and tooling.

Analogy:

L1 = city roads (Ethereum city, Solana city, etc.).
Layer 0 = a national railway network that connects all cities and lets you easily build new towns that plug into the same rail system.

What problems does Layer 0 solve?

Interoperability: Different blockchains need to send tokens and messages to each other.
Shared security: New chains can “borrow” security from a bigger hub instead of bootstrapping everything from scratch.
Easier chain creation: Teams can spin up app‑specific chains without writing an entire L1 implementation themselves.

Real examples: Polkadot and Cosmos

Polkadot (often called a Layer 0):
- The Relay Chain is the central chain that provides security and consensus.
- Parachains are independent blockchains that plug into the Relay Chain, each with its own logic (DeFi, gaming, privacy, etc.).
- They can pass messages and assets via a standard protocol, like trains moving between stations.
Cosmos (another Layer 0‑style ecosystem):
- Uses the Cosmos SDK to build custom blockchains quickly.
- Chains talk via IBC (Inter‑Blockchain Communication), a protocol for moving tokens and data between Cosmos‑based chains.

Think about this:

If you wanted to build an AI‑focused blockchain, would you start a brand new chain with no connections, or plug into a Layer 0 so you get interoperability and security from day one?

What is Layer 3? App‑specific “service roads” on top of Layer 2

Layer 3 is newer and more experimental, so definitions vary a bit across projects.

A useful mental model: Layer 3s are application‑specific networks built on top of Layer 2s, for extra customization and ultra‑cheap, tailored UX.

Analogy extension:

L2 = big elevated highway that moves a lot of cars quickly across the city.
L3 = private service roads inside a campus or industrial area, designed for a very specific kind of traffic.

Instead of one giant L2 trying to serve every use case (DEXs, games, NFTs, SocialFi), an L3 can be tuned to exactly what one ecosystem needs.

What does an L3 give you?

Customizability: Configure things like gas token, fee structure, whitelisting, and even MEV rules.
Even lower fees: Because it rides on top of an L2, you can batch more transactions and optimize for a single use case.
Better UX for one vertical: Gaming chains can optimize for fast finality; DeFi chains can optimize for risk controls and oracle latency.

Real‑world Layer 3 examples

Arbitrum Orbit:
- A framework to launch your own chain that settles on Arbitrum (an L2 on Ethereum).
- You inherit Arbitrum’s and Ethereum’s security, while setting your own rules for gas, permissions, and governance.
zkSync Hyperchains:
- Independent chains built on top of zkSync Era (L2), all using the same zkEVM stack.
- They can communicate quickly with each other and ultimately settle to Ethereum.
Orbs (Layer 3‑style infra):
- Positions itself as a Layer 3 that adds extra execution capacity around existing L1/L2 dApps.

Think about this:

Imagine Uniswap deploying its own chain where everything is optimized only for trading: ultra‑fast blocks, gas token aligned with UNI, built‑in MEV protection, and native oracle integration.

That’s the Layer 3 dream.

Side‑by‑side: where do L0 and L3 sit?

You can keep or adapt this table as needed:

Layer	Simple role	Who uses it	Examples
Layer 0	Connects and powers many L1s (interoperability + shared security)	Chain / ecosystem builders	Polkadot, Cosmos, Avalanche‑style subnet infra
Layer 1	Base blockchains (consensus + security)	Dapp devs, validators	Ethereum, Solana, Bitcoin
Layer 2	Scalability layer built on L1	Most app developers today	Arbitrum, Optimism, zkSync, Base
Layer 3	App‑specialized networks on top of L2	Larger protocols / ecosystems	Arbitrum Orbit chains, zkSync Hyperchains, Orbs

Why this matters for builders (not just theorists)

Even if you never touch Polkadot or launch an L3, understanding these layers changes how you think about architecture.

As a dapp developer today, your default is usually:
- Deploy on an L1 (Ethereum, Solana) or an L2 (Arbitrum, Optimism) for cost and UX reasons.
As your app grows, you might outgrow shared environments:
- High‑volume games, order‑book DEXs, or complex DeFi ecosystems may eventually want their own L3 or app‑chain to control fees, latency, and governance.
As an infra / chain nerd, Layer 0 tools (Cosmos SDK, Substrate / Polkadot) let you build entire ecosystems, not just dApps.

Questions to ask yourself (and your future team):

Does our idea really need its own chain, or is it overkill vs a smart contract on an existing L2?
Do we need interoperability guarantees from day one (Layer 0), or can we start simple and bridge later?

From a future DevRel perspective, knowing these tradeoffs helps you talk to founders who are deciding:

“Are we a dApp on someone else’s chain, or are we spinning up a small ecosystem of our own?”

Reflection: what finally clicked for me

At first, “Layer 0 vs Layer 3” felt like pure marketing.

What helped was ignoring the labels and asking: who is this layer actually for, and what pain does it solve?

Layer 0 is for people who want to build entire networks of chains, with shared rails and interoperability.
Layer 3 is for apps that become mini‑ecosystems and want their own specialized environment on top of existing L2s.

Once the picture became “cities, highways, campuses, and the national railway”, the whole stack felt less like buzzwords and more like different ways to scale Web3 without throwing away security.

Key Takeaway

Layer 0 connects blockchains into an internet; Layer 3 customizes the experience on top of that internet for specific apps and ecosystems.

What to do next

If you’re learning:
- Re‑read the earlier Layer 2 article from this series, then sketch the full stack from Layer 0 to Layer 3 on paper. Add real project names to each layer.
If you’re building:
- Ask: “If we 10–100x our users, would we still be okay on a shared L2, or would a future app‑chain / L3 give us critical control?”
Join the journey:
- Share which layer you’d choose for your dream Web3 app and why.
- Come hang out in Web3ForHumans on Telegram. Follow me on Medium | Twitter | Future Happy Learnings !

Future